home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder


 


 


« get schwag | main | the latest... »

5 hatracks

The Business of Understanding

"The ways of organizing information are finite. It can only be organized by location, alphabet, time, category, or hierarchy. "

thoughts on this thought? I was re-acquainted with ti recently, and category/hierarchy bothered me. i think i should prefer category/attributes....

Posted at April 23, 2004 04:52 PM


Comments

 

Which of the five LATCH cubbyholes would hold a connected network that was not a hierarchy? There are even some commercial products that give you this capability, of organizing by connectedness. So, add a G-for-graph onto the beginning of LATCH.

Then I think alphabet is a little bit too specific also. What about in-sequence by number or id as well as letter? Change the A to I and we have something a lot easier to remember -- GLITCH

Posted by George Girton at April 23, 2004 10:48 PM


~~~

Nice article. Perhaps Hierarchy should be relationship.

Posted by Matt at April 26, 2004 07:33 AM


~~~

You can create a hierarchy of relationships, you can create a hierarchy out of a connected graph, and you can create a hierarchy out of categories (categories are a hierarchy, no?). The word hirerarchy in this context seems to me to say that there are three "fixed" ways of organizing information, and two which can expand to be whatever you want them to be.

Posted by Anca at April 29, 2004 06:08 PM


~~~

It seems to me after reading Richard Wurmans article that he used the term hierarchy to mean an ordered list. He uses the following definition: "This mode organizes items by magnitude from small to large, least expensive to most expensive, by order of importance, etc.". What I mean is he is not talking about classifying things according to categories and subcategories.

I have yet to be convinced that there are only 5 ways to organize information but IŽm open to the idea. It would be interesting to here Richards comments on the criticism above. What about an interconnected graph e.g. I guess you can argue that this mode of organization is very seldom used in printed media and doesnŽt lend itself very well if one wants to find something particular in a large set of objects.

Posted by Tobias Lehtipalo at May 5, 2004 08:17 PM


~~~

see you again sometime..

Posted by Ursula Loreen at September 29, 2004 01:53 AM


~~~

Great site, well done. I enjoy beeing here and iŽll come back soon. You do a great job. Many greetings.

Posted by Shelly Mirage at October 21, 2004 01:22 AM


~~~



Post a comment
*Name:


*Email Address:


URL:


Remember me?

Comments:

bold italic underline link


posting can be slow; please wait a few seconds before hitting the button again.

The extra-fine print
wording stolen by the more-eloquent-than-I kottke
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.
Hearty discussion and unpopular viewpoints are welcome, but please keep comments on-topic and *civil*. Flaming, trolling, and ass-kissing comments are discouraged and may be deleted.
All comments, suggestions, bug reports, etc. related to the comments system should be directed to me.


mail entry to a friend

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




« get schwag | main | the latest... »

 

 

 

home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder