home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder


 


 


« yes and no | main | Rashmi brings math to the magic of personas »

fact or fiction?

guess it's a nng day today: reading Don Norman's interviews I discovered

"The article quotes me as saying: "But in Cambridge I became so frustrated with British water taps and switches and door handles - those awful sideways handles on many British doors that catch your sleeves. They don't exist in the US."
I actually said "But in Cambridge I became so frustrated with British water taps and switches and doors. The most frustrating thing about it was that no one seemed to care." The rest was added -- I didn't say it. "

Holy cow. This is immoral. indecent. plain old fashioned WRONG.

Posted at October 17, 2002 05:49 PM


Comments

 

Oh. Then I'm thinking I shouldn't mention the blatant distortion of your articles we use at ndb then?

;)

Posted by Chris Ford at October 18, 2002 02:33 AM


~~~

Being misquoted sucks puckered gopher ass.

Posted by dan at October 18, 2002 07:14 AM


~~~

designers and graphic designers? Did the fiction company org chart folks have no imagination then?

nice blog! strong voice. and I can't say if black belt jones is cooler than clemet mok, but he certainly could make the calendar of "the men of IA" if you get my drift.

hi matt!

Posted by christina at October 18, 2002 07:31 AM


~~~

That's the thing about those cross-cultural differences, Don, no one in the native culture cares because it's not wrong for them.

As an American, I'm amazed at the obvious design failings of the German "shelf" toilet. Yet, to Germans, this is clearly a perfectly correct and appropriate way to design the thing.

Posted by Andrew at October 18, 2002 09:03 AM


~~~

btw, the Wall Street Journal just had an article on Oct. 17 about the British water taps. Interestingly it's changing -- albeit slowly -- in part by Brits who've discovered there are alternatives while on holiday. But many still prefer the traditional version, percisely because it's traditional.

As to being misquoted... regrettably that's a part of being interviewed, normally due to mistakes rather than malice. The problem is once a mistake gets into print it's really hard to set the record straight since the mistake gets repeated endlessly.

Posted by George Olsen at October 18, 2002 10:11 AM


~~~



Post a comment
*Name:


*Email Address:


URL:


Remember me?

Comments:

bold italic underline link


posting can be slow; please wait a few seconds before hitting the button again.

The extra-fine print
wording stolen by the more-eloquent-than-I kottke
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.
Hearty discussion and unpopular viewpoints are welcome, but please keep comments on-topic and *civil*. Flaming, trolling, and ass-kissing comments are discouraged and may be deleted.
All comments, suggestions, bug reports, etc. related to the comments system should be directed to me.


mail entry to a friend

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




« yes and no | main | Rashmi brings math to the magic of personas »

 

 

 

home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder