home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder


 


 


« new kid on the block | main | ny times grammar issues »

next!

Technology Review - The Next Computer Interface


"The desktop is dead," declares David Gelernter.

thanks, Dan!

Posted at November 20, 2001 04:25 PM


Comments

 

Gelernter is on to something; the "chronological presentation of everything" seems to work basically like a blog-based desktop.

Posted by Andrew at November 21, 2001 01:03 AM


~~~

chronological presentation is still doomed as a desktop interface...I mean how many people are going to remember what date or time they were working on a specific document?

Posted by dan at November 21, 2001 07:14 AM


~~~

BTW, G's book "Machine Beauty" is really terriffic, although the sections where he begins to describe the chrono interface are less interesting than the rest of it.

Posted by Andrew at November 21, 2001 08:30 AM


~~~

Don't get me wrong, Gelertner's a terribly smart cookie. No matter how smart and innovative though, no information retrieval method works well everywhere...something I need to remind myself of in the glee of kewl new IA geek toys.

Posted by Jess at November 21, 2001 11:48 AM


~~~

Side note: I used to subscribe to Technology Review, but found it was mostly uninsightful academic whining.

Posted by Brad Lauster at November 21, 2001 12:09 PM


~~~

Different techniques have different purposes and knowing which one is best is based on understanding the user/audience of a project.

Posted by vanderwal at November 21, 2001 09:15 PM


~~~

I'm not saying a chronological interface is bad, I'm saying that for a primary computer interface to be good, it should take advantage of all of our abilities (including recall via chronology and location).

Posted by Brad Lauster at November 22, 2001 11:17 AM


~~~

My other issue with the current new interfaces is that many of the interfaces are reading or visually oriented. Again, they will improve and get there. I can not grab the information to use to help support and idea in a document I am compiling. Pulling a quote from the current new interface is relatively difficult. Many of the amazing zoom tools that are now years old that have come out of the University of Maryland labs that Ben Shneiderman has been developing, fall into a similar category. These tools allow a nice interface, but I can not yet use the information in a manner that I would like to use it.

Posted by vanderwal at November 22, 2001 08:09 PM


~~~



Post a comment
*Name:


*Email Address:


URL:


Remember me?

Comments:

bold italic underline link


posting can be slow; please wait a few seconds before hitting the button again.

The extra-fine print
wording stolen by the more-eloquent-than-I kottke
The bold, italics, and link buttons (and associated shortcut keys) only work in IE 5+ on the PC.
Hearty discussion and unpopular viewpoints are welcome, but please keep comments on-topic and *civil*. Flaming, trolling, and ass-kissing comments are discouraged and may be deleted.
All comments, suggestions, bug reports, etc. related to the comments system should be directed to me.


mail entry to a friend

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):




« new kid on the block | main | ny times grammar issues »

 

 

 

home | books | articles | gleanings | case studies | hire
other sites: widgetopia | blueprints for the web | metafooder